Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:35

All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Court documents reveal OpenAI is coming for your iPhone - 9to5Mac
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
How come Trump is so weak in backing down from some tariffs?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
At Chicago baseball stadium, Pope Leo makes his first pitch to America - The Washington Post
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Beware: There’s a new Trump-RFK Jr. epidemic brewing - NJ.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Red Sox To Acquire Jorge Alcala - MLB Trade Rumors
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.